Integrated pest management blueprint for indoor medicinal cannabis in Auckland
This blueprint is a system to keep pests and diseases out of an indoor facility for medicinal cannabis. The system has clean starting material, sure identification, control methods that the New Zealand regulations accept, and monitoring during the crop cycle. It also has a written record that includes the first finding, the corrective action, and the batch hold or release.
Purpose and scope
This blueprint is for the operation of an indoor medicinal cannabis facility in Auckland. It connects the identification of pests and diseases to clean stock and to the safety of workers. It also connects the identification to the regulations for products and organisms in New Zealand. It connects the identification to the release of batches after the residue test, to traceability and to CAPA. We do not want you to have the most sprays. We want you to have an alternative when a pest or disease problem and a compliance problem occur at the same time.
We used the supplied 128-page IPM Book V15 to compare the coverage of this paper with the book[10]. The book includes these parts: the basic information about IPM, cultural controls, environmental controls, biological controls and chemical controls. It also includes how to make a program, eight arthropod profiles, six disease profiles, aids for identification, a glossary and tools for operators. This paper is not a copy of the book. It does not contain the commercial programs of the book, its figures or its rates. For this paper, sources of the authorities in New Zealand and primary literature are more important than the book.
Use a photo to select where to look and which part of the plant to collect as a sample. Do not use a photo to make sure that you know the species. An AI tool made each photo in this paper. Microscopy is necessary for broad mites and russet mites, and RT-qPCR or RT-PCR is necessary for HLVd. A diagnostic laboratory is frequently necessary for root diseases and leaf diseases. A photo that shows the correct signs is not a test result.
- The current status is more important than this paper. Examine the current information each time that you get or use a product. Use the information from the Ministry, ACVM, EPA, WorkSafe, the label and the SDS.
- The thresholds of a facility are controlled values. The numbers in this blueprint are examples or start values. Use a number from this blueprint only if your approved SOP includes it.
- Previous damage stays on the plant. Examine living organisms, new lesions, new growth, traps, roots or laboratory results. Use them to make sure that a control had the correct effect. A plant that is in better condition is not a sign of the effect.
- Clean stock is the most important part. A problem in the mother room increases in each clone lot. Thus give the mother room the best protection.
Definitions
This section gives the terms for biology, diagnosis, operation and the regulations of New Zealand. The blueprint uses these terms.
Evidence and limitations
We want each paper to be correct. Thus we examine each paper for information that is not solid. This information comes from the view of one grower, from a small number of sources, or from grower methods that have no controlled test. We identify this information, and we do not show it as solid.
Frequently there is no paper for the decision that you must make. Then we use the reports of other growers and the methods that work in the rooms that we know. This information can help you, but it is not the result of a laboratory test. Use the methods that work for your plants, for your room and for your meters. If a table does not agree with your crop, use the data from your crop and record the difference.
- The structure of exclusion, clean stock, monitoring and CAPA.
- In the NZ pathway, the approval status of a product is not the same as the fact that a person used the product one time.
- Threshold models and controls for the mother room, as SOPs of the facility.
- The approval status of a specified product or organism, with no check of the register at this time.
- Figures that an AI system makes, as a method to make sure of the identification of a pest. The figures are only aids for training.
If you find an error, make a report. We will correct it. Make the report on GitHub, with the name of the paper and the information that is incorrect. If you have a source, include it: Make a report of an accuracy problem. The regulations, labels and licenses of your area always override each procedure in these papers. The label weak in a paper shows the points where the risk of an error is highest.
Basic information about IPM, control layers and the feedback loop
IPM is a loop with these steps: prevent the movement of pests into the facility, monitor with the same procedure each time, and identify correctly. Then compare the finding with a controlled threshold, use compatible controls together, record the result and do a recheck. If the recheck shows that the result is not satisfactory, the loop starts again with a stronger response. The reference on arthropods and the cannabis literature agree with control in layers for an indoor crop, and not with one product on a calendar[11].
| Layer | Function | Instruction |
|---|---|---|
| Cultural control | Keep the problem out. Put new material in quarantine. Clean the surfaces and tools, and control the movement of persons and plants. Remove the debris and weeds that give protection to pests. Do the scouting on a route that does not change, and keep a written record. | Use this layer before you use a higher layer. |
| Environmental control | Remove the conditions of temperature, moisture, airflow and root zone that help the problem. | Use this layer before you use a higher layer. |
| Biological control | Release the correct predator, parasitoid, nematode or antagonist before the pest pressure becomes too high. The number of predators increases slowly. Thus the date of release must agree with this slow increase and not with the day that the problem becomes clear. | Use this layer before you use a higher layer. |
| Chemical or low-risk control | Use it only when the legal gate accepts the product. Apply it to the life stage that is not resistant to it. Then do a recheck on a date that you set before the application. | Use this layer before you use a higher layer. |
HLVd in clean stock and broad mites or russet mites in quarantine are exclusion events or quality events. Root aphids in propagation, powdery mildew on flowers and Botrytis in a bud are also exclusion events or quality events. A low count of adult fungus gnats in a vegetative room that is in operation can be a problem that you monitor with trend data. Use the organism and the consequence for the room. Do not use one number for all organisms and rooms.
| Severity | Name | Definition | Standard response |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Not found | No confirmed organism and no damage. Keep the set monitoring frequency, with no change. | Monitor |
| 1 | Trace | One confirmed organism, colony or lesion at one point on the map, with no sign of movement to other points. | Escalate. Use the approved decision matrix. |
| 2 | Local | More than one finding in one zone, or a trap count that increases from one reading to the next. The problem does not move across the room. | Escalate. Use the approved decision matrix. |
| 3 | Established | Some zones have the problem, or more than one life stage occurs again and again. The incidence of disease increases, or the beneficial organisms do not control the pests. | Escalate. Use the approved decision matrix. |
| 4 | Systemic | The problem moves across the room or into connected rooms. The problem is in clean stock, the crop quality is at risk, or equipment or systems of more than one room have contamination. | Escalate. Use the approved decision matrix. |
The legal gate for IPM controls in NZ
In New Zealand, no one document has all the regulations for pests in medicinal cannabis. The decision uses these sources of regulations: the regulations for medicinal cannabis and the minimum quality standard, ACVM, and the controls of HSNO and EPA. It also uses WorkSafe, the release of batches after laboratory tests, and the requirements of Auckland for trade waste and for the environment.
Regulation 18 has limits on the treatment of cannabis crops with pesticides. Regulation 7 gives the residues for which a test is necessary and the limits for these residues. The current guidance of the Ministry shows the difference between inhalation pathways and non-inhalation pathways. The guidance also clearly keeps the requirements of ACVM and HSNO[1][2]. A residue panel can include abamectin, spinosad, pyrethrins or a different analyte. A substance in the panel does not show that the regulations let you apply it.
For most agricultural compounds, ACVM registration is necessary. Some classes of product have an exemption, but you must obey the conditions of the exemption and the other regulations[3]. You must make sure that the approvals and the controls of the EPA are correct. This check includes the approval information in section 15 of the current New Zealand SDS[5].
- 11. End product of the lotBefore all other steps, make the decision if a part of this lot can become flower that a patient inhales. If it can, keep the lot on the inhalation pathway from the start. The regulations for products that a patient does not inhale let you use more substances. It is easy to use these regulations accidentally. These regulations are not available to a lot that a patient can inhale.
- 22. Medicinal cannabis pathwayMake sure that the active ingredient or product has a route that the regulations accept specially for medicinal cannabis. Regulation 18 is an example of this route. Regulation 7 is for residues that a laboratory measures in the end product. A substance can be in this regulation because a laboratory measures it. The regulation does not give approval to apply the substance to the crop.
- 33. ACVM authorityMake sure that the product has a registration. If it does not, make sure that an exemption includes the product. Make sure that a document shows the exemption, and obey each condition of the exemption. If a product is not on a register, you do not know its status. This fact does not show that the product has an exemption.
- 44. HSNO approvalMake sure that the substance has an EPA approval, and read the controls of the approval. The safety data sheet (SDS) is the hazard document of the supplier for a product. Examine section 15 of the current New Zealand version, and compare it with the EPA database. Do not use only the sheet.
- 55. Worker controlsRead the current label and the safety data sheet. They give the necessary personal protective equipment (PPE) and the controls for the application. The restricted entry interval (REI) is the period after an application. In this period, a person can go into the area only with the specified PPE and conditions. The product sets the length of the period, and the crop area can look correct before the period ends. An indoor area with an REI must have signs and controlled access.
- 66. Laboratory test routeBefore you put a product in the approved-input register, make sure that you know four items. Find which residues the laboratory must measure and the limit of residues for the release of the batch. Make sure that the accreditation of the laboratory includes the test for these residues. Make sure that the method can measure a sufficiently low concentration. The lowest concentration that a method can measure with satisfactory confidence is the limit of quantification (LOQ). A method with an LOQ more than the limit for release cannot show that the batch is correct.
- 77. Compatible with beneficial organismsExamine the current side-effect data for each beneficial organism in the room. The beneficial organisms are predatory mites, predator insects, parasitoids, nematodes and microbe products. Side-effect data show the effect of a product on these organisms and the time that the effect continues. A spray can obey the regulations and also kill the beneficial organisms. The number of these organisms increased slowly, during many weeks.
- 88. Route to the environmentBefore the application, make a decision on where each of these items goes and how you contain it. The items are the remaining mixture, rinse water, PPE with contamination and spilled liquid. No item goes to stormwater. The position of Watercare for the site sets if an item can go to the sewer as trade waste.
Record these values in the approved-input register with the current label and SDS. Use version control for the register. WorkSafe tells you that the REI is different for each product, crop, application and exposure. For an application that is not on the label, a risk assessment for that application is necessary. An indoor area with an REI must have warning signs and controlled access[6].
| Class of product or organism | Initial status | Items to examine |
|---|---|---|
| Soaps of fatty acids and permitted salts | Possible low-risk contact alternative | The correct pathway for medicinal cannabis, the approval of the product, the crop site, residue and quality, PPE and REI |
| Sulfur | Possible inhalation pathway for the active ingredient | The approval of the product, the exposure in the indoor area, the limits for the crop stage and the quality, compatibility, and the current label |
| Hydrogen peroxide | Possible active pathway for specified applications | Contact with the crop compared with sanitation of pipes and surfaces, concentration, exposure of workers, phytotoxicity and the discharge route |
| Active ingredients from food and from permitted food additives | Possible pathway only if you obey all the conditions | Conditions for novel food and for composition. The ACVM and HSNO status of the product. The application that you do and the laboratory test route. |
| Active ingredients that are microbes | The regulation pathway has the names of some species and strains | The correct species, strain and product. Viability in the application. ACVM and HSNO status. Effects on organisms that are not the target and on beneficial organisms. The label. |
| Conventional pesticide for food crops | Not automatically an inhalation pathway | A permitted non-inhalation pathway or a permitted pathway for medicinal cannabis, if there is one. Also how to calculate the residue and how to do the residue tests. |
| Beneficial organism | Not the same as an active ingredient of a pesticide | The current status of the organism, the import route and the release route, the supplier, the cold chain, containment, and compatibility with the facility |
A laboratory can do the tests for pesticides and for the other non-critical quality attributes of the minimum quality standard. The laboratory must have GMP or ISO/IEC 17025:2017 with the correct scope. For critical quality attributes, the laboratory must have GMP. Before you use a release procedure, make sure that the scope and the method of the laboratory are correct[2].
Clean-stock controls in IPM
The mother room is not only the area where clones start. It is a system for starting material. A problem in the mother room increases in each cutting, room and batch downstream.
A plant with HLVd can show no symptoms. HLVd moves easily with vegetative propagation and with tools that have contamination. Investigations show a risk that HLVd can move through roots and through recirculating hydroponic solution[24][25][26]. Thus a visual check of the plant is not a test for release.
- Make foundation mothers only from released material. Foundation mothers have the best controls.
- You can trace the parent of each production mother, cutting lot and room.
- Sanitize tools between specified groups of plants. Do not sanitize tools only at the end of the work period.
- Quarantine, foundation stock and production stock do not use the same nutrient solution. They do not use the same return water without validation.
- Before you collect the first sample, write the procedure for a positive result or an inconclusive result. The procedure must show how to hold the plants, do the test again, destroy the plants and do the traceback.
| Class of plant | Typical frequency | Instruction for sampling | Instruction for the decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Received accession | At receipt, and again before release from quarantine if the risk makes it necessary | One sample for each plant. Validated tissue and validated method. | Do not release the accession until it agrees with the release criteria. |
| Foundation mother | When you make the mother, and then at the times that the risk makes necessary | Do one test for each plant. Do not use pooled samples as the usual method, unless you validate the pooled sample. | Positive result: destroy the mother, hold the connected clones, do an investigation. |
| Production mother | Before a large production of cuttings, or at the times that the site selects | One sample for each plant or a validated pooled sample, with reflex testing | Positive result: stop the movement of clones and trace the clones since the last negative result that you know is correct. |
| Clone lot | A check that the risk and the status of the mother make necessary | A sampling procedure for each lot, with controls | Hold the connected rooms if the status of the source has a problem. |
| Hydro environment | Investigation or sentinel testing if there is a risk in the system | Tank, return water and root interface, with a validated method | A positive result from the hydro environment starts an investigation of all the connected plants. The result does not give an automatic diagnosis of one plant. |
Make the trace tree first. You must identify each clone lot since the last negative result that you know is correct. If you cannot, you do not know which rooms have the problem after a positive result for a mother.
Facility contamination pathways
A vector can move a pest or a pathogen from one area to a different area. It is not important which group of personnel has the vector. A clean-stock program gives no protection if a worker goes back to a clean area or if scissors go between mothers. It also gives no protection if return air connects to quarantine or if a reservoir for more than one area moves root pathogens. References on cannabis diseases frequently show these routes of contamination: stock, tools, water, debris, density and the conditions of the environment. The routes have an effect on each other[19].
A trade waste agreement with Watercare is necessary if the discharge of a facility is not low risk. The trade waste agreement gives the controls and the monitoring for the site[8]. In the E33 requirements of Auckland, the primary task is to prevent the discharge of contaminants. The requirements also make it necessary to have the correct control on the site, containment, treatment or permitted disposal[9]. The address of the site, the drainage and the classification of the operation are data that the facility must supply.
Cultural controls and environmental controls
These controls continue to operate when the facility becomes larger. Remove weeds, algae and plant debris. Keep doors, screens and barriers in good condition. Put each source of genetics in quarantine. Move personnel and material in one direction.
Keep the same scouting route. Measure the conditions of the root zone and of the canopy. Set the conditions correctly. These controls decrease the risk that pests go into the facility, and the rate of movement of pests in the facility.
| Control point | Minimum check | Sign of a problem | Correction |
|---|---|---|---|
| External and internal pest reservoirs | Weeds, algae, drains, debris and standing water | Frequent high counts of small flies, or pest reservoirs | Remove the source. Repair the drainage and the leaks. Clean the area. Examine the result. |
| Sanitizer | Product, concentration, contact time, and a clean surface | No record of the concentration, a dirty surface, or removal of the sanitizer before the end of the contact time | Mix the sanitizer again. Clean the surface first. Use the full contact time again. |
| Canopy air | Air speed at typical points, dead zones and movement of leaves | Areas with high density and no air movement, condensation, or a zone with frequent Botrytis or powdery mildew | Adjust the fans and the HVAC, and decrease the density of the canopy |
| The change from day to night | Temperature of leaves and surfaces, RH, and the dew-point margin | Condensation, or a small dew-point margin while the lights are off | Change humidity removal, air movement, temperature ramp and the time of irrigation |
| Root zone | Temperature, dissolved oxygen if it is important, moisture pattern, drain, biofilm and algae | Warm saturated roots, drainage that is not satisfactory, sloughing, or the same symptoms in the plants of a cohort | Correct the irrigation, the oxygen and the heat. Isolate the plants. Do a diagnosis. |
| Sticky traps | ID, color, height, date, and a clean surface that you can read | Traps that are not on the map, or counts with no position and no record of previous counts | Replace the traps. Put the traps on the map. Use the same procedure to read the traps. |
A canopy with high density, cold surfaces, the time of irrigation and the change to darkness can cause wet tissue, or tissue near condensation. At the same time, the wall sensor can show a satisfactory value. Measure the conditions in the areas where the risk is. Record the trigger for a correction.
Biological control programs
A biological control program gives a satisfactory result when all of these conditions occur. The organism that you receive must be the correct organism and a living organism. You release it into a crop and a climate that are correct for it. It survives the residues that are in the crop, finds the target stage and establishes where necessary. You do a check to make sure that the result is satisfactory. Generalist predators and specialist predators are not interchangeable, and aphid parasitoids and whitefly parasitoids are not interchangeable[15][16].
| Control group | Typical function | Checks for the release procedure |
|---|---|---|
| Canopy predatory mites | Phytoseiulus persimilis for hotspots of spider mites. Neoseiulus californicus or Neoseiulus fallacis for control of spider mites in a larger area. Neoseiulus cucumeris or Amblyseius swirskii for thrips larvae and, if there is evidence for it, for broad mites or the first stages of whitefly. | Before you use these organisms, examine the current New Zealand status of each organism. Make sure that a supplier has the organism, and that you know the pest stage that it eats. Make sure that the room climate is correct for it. Examine the method of release, in sachets or loose, and the residues that are in the room. Make sure that there is evidence that it stays in the crop and increases in number. |
| Canopy predators | Orius species for the life stages of thrips. Lacewing larvae for aphids and other prey with soft bodies on the plant surface, if evidence shows that they agree with the prey. | Examine the current New Zealand status. Make sure that a supplier has the predators. Then release the predators when the prey is in the correct stage. Examine how far they move and the crop stage. Make sure that there is sufficient prey, because the predators eat each other when there is not. Examine the residues that kill them. |
| Parasitoids of aphids | Aphidius species that you select for the confirmed aphid host. The cannabis aphid, the green peach aphid and the potato aphid are not interchangeable targets. | Examine the current New Zealand status. Make sure that a supplier has the parasitoids, and that they agree with the host. Then monitor the mummies, which show parasitism. Look for wasps that kill the parasitoids, if the wasps are a problem. Monitor the residues, and the date when the next release is necessary. |
| Parasitoids of whitefly | Encarsia formosa or Eretmocerus species that you select for the confirmed whitefly species and nymph stage. | Examine the current New Zealand status. Make sure that a supplier has the parasitoids. Then examine the whitefly species, the time of release, the climate and the evidence of parasitism. Make sure that the residues in the room are compatible. |
| Root-zone predators | Stratiolaelaps scimitus and, if the regulations accept it and it is available, Dalotia coriaria. They are for fungus gnat larvae, the stages of thrips that stay in the soil, and other small prey in the media. | Examine the current New Zealand status. Make sure that a supplier has the predators. Examine the depth and moisture of the media, and if there is prey for the predators. Make sure that the predators are live when you receive them. Examine how equally you put them in the media. Examine the residues that are in the media, and if the number of predators increases. |
| Beneficial nematodes | Steinernema feltiae for fungus gnat larvae that are not resistant to it, and for other stages in the media if there is evidence for it. | Make sure that the regulations accept the product and the organism, and that they are available. When you receive the nematodes, examine a sample. Use the shape to find the live nematodes and the nematodes that died. Keep them cold and use them quickly. Examine the agitation and oxygen in the tank and the light on the nematodes. Examine the sizes of the filters and nozzles, and find if a dip, drench or sprench is correct. |
| Entomopathogenic microbes | Beauveria and other approved strains that infect insects, for the aphid, thrips, whitefly or other stages that the label gives. | Examine the strain and the product, and its pathway in New Zealand. Then control the storage and the viability. Examine the contact and the conditions of the environment that are necessary for it. Examine the effect on organisms that are not the target. Examine the controls for workers, the residues, and the recheck. |
| Plant-pathogen antagonists | Trichoderma, Bacillus or Streptomyces strains. They prevent disease from root pathogens or pathogens on the foliage, if there is evidence for it. They do not repair necrosis or a plant that has the pathogen in the internal tissue. | Examine the strain and the product, and its status in New Zealand. Make sure that a supplier has it. Keep it away from sanitizers. Examine if it is correct for the reservoir and the crop, the storage, and if it colonizes the roots. Examine the evidence for the result that you want. |
- 1Get approvalMake sure that you know which organism or product you will use, and the name of the supplier. Make sure that you know the legal status in NZ, the compatibility and the target stage.
- 2ReceiveRecord the lot, and the time and temperature when you receive the product or organism. Record the condition of the packaging, the expiry date and the period in which you can use it.
- 3Examine viabilityUse the method of the supplier. Examine the movement, the counts, the survival of nematodes or the condition of microbes. Reject material that is not satisfactory.
- 4ReleaseMake a map of the release rate and the release location. Compare the map with the crop stage, the areas where the pest is, and the conditions of the environment.
- 5EstablishLook for predators, hosts that have parasitoids, mummies, a smaller number of the prey stage, or other specified evidence.
- 6CorrectIf the organisms do not establish, find the cause. The cause can be dead organisms, an incorrect species or stage, climate, residues, the time of release or application.
Make sure that the regulations let the species of the invertebrate come into New Zealand. Make sure that you have the permits and the facilities that are necessary. Obey the biosecurity requirements and HSNO. Do not use the list of products of a supplier in a different country as the release list for NZ[4].
Selection and application of products
When a finding is more than the threshold, select the smallest number of controls. The controls must have an effect on the confirmed organism, the life stage and the plant part. The controls must agree with the regulations, be safe for workers, be compatible with the beneficial organisms, and not stop the release of batches. Where it is important, change the IRAC group or the FRAC group each time that you apply a control. You must also make sure that physical controls and controls with living organisms are compatible.
| Mode | Function | Typical problem |
|---|---|---|
| Contact control | Kills only the organisms that the spray touches | Coverage that is not satisfactory on the leaf underside or the flower, or life stages in areas that the spray cannot touch |
| Smothering or desiccation | Causes mechanical damage to soft-bodied pests | Damage to the crop at some stages, coverage that is not full, or no compatibility |
| Microbe that is an insect pathogen | Causes an infection in a pest stage that this microbe can infect, if the conditions are correct | Incorrect stage, low viability, humidity that is not correct, or residue that is not compatible |
| Predator or parasitoid | A predator eats the target pest. A parasitoid has its development in the target pest. | A release after the correct time, an incorrect host, dead organisms when you receive them, or no establishment |
| Root-zone antagonist | Decreases the establishment and the quantity of the pathogen | A person uses it to repair dead roots, or mixes it with a sanitizer that kills it |
| Oxidation and sanitation | Decreases contamination on the validated application site | You think that a rate for the sanitation of pipes and surfaces is safe, or has efficacy, on the plants of the crop |
| Correction of the environment | Removes a condition that helps the problem | Correction of the room average only, when the microclimate is not correct |
Calibrate the output. Make sure that the water is correct. Add the products in the correct sequence. Make sure that the agitation is correct. Select the nozzle, the pressure and the coverage of the target. Set the lights and the HVAC correctly.
Contain the runoff. Clean the equipment. Put warning signs in position for the REI. Do a phytotoxicity test on a small area of the crop if your approved SOP makes it necessary. A product that the regulations let you use gives an unsatisfactory result if you apply it incorrectly.
| Approved-input register field | Necessary |
|---|---|
| Product and supplier | Yes |
| Active ingredient / living organism / strain | Yes |
| Target organism and target life stage | Yes |
| Inhalation pathway, or non-inhalation pathway with separation | Yes |
| Legal basis for medicinal cannabis | Yes |
| ACVM registration or exemption evidence | Yes |
| EPA approval / HSNO controls and current SDS version | Yes |
| Label instructions, crop or contact site, and application method | Yes |
| IRAC or FRAC group, or the physical mode of action, or the biological mode of action | Yes |
| PPE, REI, signs, pre-harvest interval or withholding period, and limit for the crop stage | Yes |
| Test method, necessary limit, and the LOQ that is possible in the laboratory | Yes |
| Compatibility with each beneficial organism in the room | Yes |
| Requirements for mixture, water quality, calibration and clean-out | Yes |
| Route for waste, rinse water and spilled liquid | Yes |
| Evidence grade, the person who gives the approval, the last check, and the date of the next review | Yes |
Arthropod identification
The photo is the start of the diagnosis. Examine the morphology to make sure that the identification is correct. Collect a sample from the correct plant part. Find the difference between the organism and the problems with the same signs. Then select controls that have an effect on the life stage that you found.
Cannabis has many different piercing-sucking pests and many pests in the root zone. Primary references show that, for control in an indoor crop, it is important to know the correct identification, the life cycle and the plant location[11][12].
1. Rice root aphid (Rhopalosiphum rufiabdominale)

References for this profile: [14][11]
2. Fungus gnats (Bradysia species)

References for this profile: [17][11]
3. Thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis and other thrips species)

References for this profile: [12][11]
4. Two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae)

References for this profile: [12][11]
5. Broad mite (Polyphagotarsonemus latus)

References for this profile: [16][12][11]
6. Hemp russet mite (Aculops cannabicola)

References for this profile: [12][11]
7. Whiteflies (Trialeurodes vaporariorum, Bemisia tabaci complex and related species)

References for this profile: [12][11]
8. Aphids on leaves (Phorodon cannabis, Myzus persicae, Macrosiphum euphorbiae and other species)

References for this profile: [13][12]
9. Budworms and caterpillars (Lepidopteran larvae. You must identify the species.)

References for this profile: [11]
Disease diagnosis and sampling
Disease symptoms can be the same for different diseases. Use the symptoms to select the tissue, the records of the environment and the correct laboratory route. Do not make a release decision only because a symptom agrees with a photo.
The cannabis literature on diseases gives evidence for different controls for powdery mildew, Botrytis, Pythium, Fusarium and systemic pathogens in propagation[20][21][22]. Related species of Septoria make the diagnosis not easy. Thus the color of the lesion is not sufficient for the diagnosis[27][28].
1. Powdery mildew (Golovinomyces and other powdery mildew fungi on cannabis)

References for this profile: [20][19]
2. Botrytis bud rot (Botrytis cinerea)

References for this profile: [21][19]
3. Pythium root, crown rot and damping-off (Pythium species (oomycetes))

References for this profile: [23][22][19]
4. Fusarium wilt, root and crown disease (Fusarium species complexes)

References for this profile: [22][19]
5. Hop latent viroid disease (Hop latent viroid (HLVd))

References for this profile: [24][25][26]
6. Septoria leaf spot (Septoria cannabis, S. neocannabina, S. cannabicola and other Septoria species)

Problems with the same signs
An atlas without reference plants in good condition makes personnel see disease in all plants. Compare the same parts: underside to underside, opened flower to opened flower and new meristem to new meristem. Compare roots of the same age in the same substrate.








| Two problems with the same signs | Sign that shows the difference | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| Adult fungus gnat compared with winged root aphid | A gnat has the legs and the antennae of a fly, and wing veins. An aphid has a body in the shape of a pear, and cornicles. | Keep the specimen from the sticky trap near the media. Use microscopy. |
| Broad mites or russet mites compared with tacoing from heat or light | Mites and eggs on the outer edge of the symptoms, where you collect a sample. Abiotic stress agrees with the pattern of exposure and has no organisms. | Examine many tips with a microscope before you change the feed or the climate. |
| Powdery mildew compared with dried residue on the leaf | Powdery mildew makes colonies above the surface that increase in size, and fungal structures. Residue agrees with the pattern of drops and circular marks, and with the spray records. | Light from one side, microscopy, or a laboratory test. Use a laboratory test if you make the decision about the flower from the identification. |
| Pythium compared with abiotic root stress | Pythium: roots with water in the tissue, sloughing, and a pattern of disease in connected plants. Abiotic stress: dry tan roots with stress and no evidence of a pathogen. | Collect samples of roots and water before sanitation. Send the samples to a diagnostic laboratory. |
| HLVd compared with all other causes of stunting | No visual sign gives a sure diagnosis. | RT-qPCR or RT-PCR, with a sample that you can trace and with controls |
The IPM program for each week
- 1Calculate the consequenceRoom class, clean-stock status, target organism, crop stage and the consequence for product quality.
- 2Measure the problemIncidence, severity 0-4 and life stages. The pattern in the room and the trend of traps, roots and laboratory results. The density of beneficial organisms.
- 3Zero-tolerance findingsA zero-tolerance finding does not use a threshold with a number. Start containment immediately.
- 4Find the sourceReceived stock, movement of personnel and tools, air, water, media, packaging, weeds, algae, or pests from the previous crop.
- 5Select layersFirst do a correction with cultural controls and environmental controls. Then select biological controls and permitted products that are compatible.
- 6ScheduleSelect the target life stage and the date of application or release. Select the room controls, the change of mode, the recheck date, and the instruction to stop or to escalate.
- 7Examine the resultMeasure living organisms, new lesions, new growth, establishment and damage to the plants. Examine the effect on residue and if the problem occurs again.
- 8Stop or CAPAStop the response only when the result agrees with the condition for a good result. If it does not, examine the cause again and escalate.
| Information for the meeting each week | Decision output |
|---|---|
| Trap and scouting trends | A task for each room or zone, an owner and a recheck |
| HLVd and pathogen results | A decision to release, hold, do the test again, destroy and trace |
| Receipt, release and establishment of beneficial organisms | A decision to continue, to add more organisms, to replace them, or to do an investigation of a problem with compatibility |
| Excursions of the environment and of the root zone | Correction with engineering controls or cultural controls, and a date for the end of the correction |
| Applications of products and the status of treated areas | Release of the area from the REI, a check of the efficacy and a check of the residue |
| Open CAPA and connected batches | Status of containment, gap in the evidence, quality decision for the batch, and a check of the effect of the CAPA |
Worksheet for the decision about the control method
| Decision item | Controlled entry |
|---|---|
| Confirmed target, life stage and plant part | FACILITY INPUT |
| Current problem: incidence, severity, trend and distribution | FACILITY INPUT |
| Possible source and pathway, and the evidence | FACILITY INPUT |
| Corrections with cultural controls and environmental controls | FACILITY INPUT |
| Biological control, evidence of establishment and compatibility | FACILITY INPUT |
| Alternative product, legal gate, mode group and residue route | FACILITY INPUT |
| Limits from the crop and the workers, REI and release of the treated area | FACILITY INPUT |
| Owner, date of the task, recheck date, the condition for a good result, and the instruction to stop or to escalate | FACILITY INPUT |
Table for control steps and releases of beneficial organisms, with dates
| Date and time | Room or zone | Target stage | Task or release | Mode or organism | Compatibility and REI | Recheck |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
Table of the target and the approved tool
| Target | Approved tool at this time | Target stage and site | Grade and source of the evidence | Date of the check of the regulations | Compatibility | Measurement of a good result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
Crop-cycle IPM operations
| Stage | Standard work for each day | Work for each week, or scheduled work | Mandatory decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Receipt and quarantine | Accession, check of the source and of the regulations, visual inspection and inspection of roots, dedicated tools and waste | Traps, procedure for HLVd and pathogens, and a new check of the status | Release only if the accession agrees with the release criteria for the regulations and for biology. |
| Foundation mothers and production mothers | Walk to examine the plants, control of tools, irrigation and environment | Times of the molecular tests, full scouting, audit of hygiene in pruning | A positive result for HLVd, or a pest that is systemic or has a high consequence: stop, hold, trace. |
| Cuttings and rooting | Clean cutting procedure, humidity and airflow, dead cuttings, and inspection of roots | Development of roots, traps, a check for fungus and for root disease | A pattern of problems starts an investigation of the source and of the water, and a diagnosis. |
| Vegetative | Inspection of the environment and the root zone. Walk to look for pests that you can see. | Full scouting, sticky traps, release and establishment of biological controls | One hotspot with a high risk, or a trend that increases, starts a control step for the target. |
| Flower | Climate, dew point, air movement and inspection of canopy with high density | Full scouting. In the last stage of flowering, cut the buds that have the highest risk. Examine the buds. Do a check of residue and application. | Powdery mildew on a flower, or Botrytis in a bud: start the control steps immediately. |
| Harvest, drying and batch hold | Hygiene when you move and touch the plant material, separation of waste, condition of the dry room and checks for mold | Sampling for residue, microbes and unwanted material, and a check of the deviations | Release the batch or continue the batch hold. Do a remediation if the regulations let you and the method has validation, or reject the batch. |
Tools with contamination and dirty processing equipment can cause contamination of a clean crop. Slow drying, drying at different rates and flowers with high density that you do not examine can also cause problems for a clean crop. The product stays in batch hold until you have the necessary quality evidence and you complete the check of the deviations.
Containment, investigation and CAPA
Classify each event as local, room-wide or systemic. First do the containment. Then find the root cause and the effect on the batch. Keep the evidence. Do not complete the CAPA until the check of the effect shows that the change had the correct effect.
| Event | First containment steps | Investigation of the batch and the crop | Items for the CAPA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mother with a positive result for HLVd | Stop the movement of clones. Isolate the mother. Put the mother in a bag. Use the SOP. Hold the connected clones. | All clone lots since the last negative result that you know is correct, and the connected tools and water | Source, frequency of tests, integrity of samples, sanitation of tools, separation of hydro systems, and traceability |
| Powdery mildew on flower | Isolate the zone or the room. Put the tissue with disease in bags. Increase the scouting. | Size of the area with disease, crop stage, permitted alternatives, residue and the decision for the market | Microclimate at night, density, airflow, sensitivity of the scouting and compatibility with the program |
| Botrytis in a flower | Remove the flower carefully. Prevent the movement of spores. Examine the plants near it. | Batch hold and size of the area, pattern for each cultivar and zone, records of the environment | Humidity removal, condensation, structure of the flower, damage when personnel touch the plants, and debris |
| Root disease in plants that use the same water | Isolate the circuit. Stop the movement of water and plants. Collect samples before sanitation. | All connected cohorts and the source stock | Design of the reservoir and of the return water, biofilm, temperature and DO, cleaning validation, and separation of water |
| A worker goes into the area during the REI | Remove the worker. Do the steps for the exposure. Prevent access to the area. Put warning signs in position. | Examine the contact with the crop, the contamination and the treatment status | Lockout, position of the warning signs, training, supervision and access control |
- Release: the necessary laboratory results, the treatment records, the traceability and the check of the deviations are satisfactory.
- Continue the batch hold: a result, a second sample or a connected lot status is not available. Also continue the batch hold while an investigation is in progress.
- Reject, or do a validated remediation: the lot does not agree with a limit. Do the same if the treatment records do not agree with the regulations. Do the same if the lot has a connection to systemic contamination. Remediation does not replace prevention.
Controlled IPM tools
Facility approval sheet
Scouting record for each week
| Necessary field | Entry |
|---|---|
| Date and time, scout, room, zone, bench and point on the set route | FACILITY INPUT |
| Plant or lot ID and growth stage | FACILITY INPUT |
| Parts that you examined: top of the leaf, underside of the leaf, shoot tip, stem and crown, flower, media and roots | FACILITY INPUT |
| Trap ID, color, height, date of installation and of replacement, and trap count for each organism | FACILITY INPUT |
| Confirmed organism, life stage, incidence and severity 0 to 4 | FACILITY INPUT |
| Beneficial organism and the evidence that its number increases | FACILITY INPUT |
| Unusual condition in the environment or root zone, and the last treatment | FACILITY INPUT |
| Photo ID, specimen ID, chain of custody and lab result | FACILITY INPUT |
| Threshold status, containment, person for the task and date for the task | FACILITY INPUT |
| Recheck date, the condition for a good result, and the decision to stop the response or to open a CAPA | FACILITY INPUT |
| Sites to examine, completed sites, and exceptions for sites that you did not examine or sites without access | FACILITY INPUT |
Log of quarantine and of movement from clean to dirty
| Date and time | Person or material | From | To | Release and status evidence | Change of PPE and tools | Exception approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
Record of the release and establishment of beneficial organisms
| Field | Entry |
|---|---|
| Species, strain, supplier and lot | FACILITY INPUT |
| Evidence of the NZ legal status, and the approval date | FACILITY INPUT |
| Time, temperature and condition when you receive the organisms | FACILITY INPUT |
| Viability and count check, and the decision to reject | FACILITY INPUT |
| Target pest and stage, room map and release rate | FACILITY INPUT |
| Climate, and a check of residues that are not compatible | FACILITY INPUT |
| Establishment and recheck date, and evidence | FACILITY INPUT |
| Corrective action, or the decision to stop the response | FACILITY INPUT |
Checklist for the quality of spray and of application
| Check | Controlled entry |
|---|---|
| Event ID, approved product and lot, target, room and zone, crop stage | FACILITY INPUT |
| Evidence of the check of the current label, SDS and the regulations for medicinal cannabis, ACVM and HSNO | FACILITY INPUT |
| Applicator, calibration, output, nozzle and pressure, and target coverage | FACILITY INPUT |
| Water quality, sequence for the mixture, agitation and volume of the mixture | FACILITY INPUT |
| Controls for HVAC and lights, containment, and risk of weather and external discharge | FACILITY INPUT |
| PPE, warning signs, access control, REI start and end, and release of the treated area | FACILITY INPUT |
| Mixture that you did not use, rinse water, disposal of spills and waste, and equipment clean-down | FACILITY INPUT |
| Phytotoxicity, efficacy and residue: recheck dates and results | FACILITY INPUT |
Record of the outbreak, the effect on the batch, and the CAPA
| Field | Entry |
|---|---|
| Event ID, the first finding, and the person who found it | FACILITY INPUT |
| Confirmed organism, evidence and uncertainty | FACILITY INPUT |
| Room, zone, plants, mothers, clone lots and batches | FACILITY INPUT |
| Connected personnel, tools, air, water, media and lots of products | FACILITY INPUT |
| Containment done immediately, and controls for the treated area | FACILITY INPUT |
| Investigation of the effect on product quality and on residue | FACILITY INPUT |
| Decision to hold, destroy, do a remediation, or release | FACILITY INPUT |
| Root cause and other conditions that help to cause the event | FACILITY INPUT |
| Corrective action and preventive action, with owners and dates | FACILITY INPUT |
| Evidence that the CAPA had the correct effect, and the decision of QA to stop the response | FACILITY INPUT |
Worksheet for the dashboard of the population trend
| Week or date | Room or zone | Target | Traps or points for samples | Count of living organisms, or incidence | Severity 0-4 | Density of beneficial organisms | Action threshold | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
| FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT | FACILITY INPUT |
Control of spills and waste
- The current drain map shows which drains go to the sewer or to trade waste, and which drains go to stormwater.
- Secondary containment and spill kits are correct for the substances that you keep and for the spill volume that can occur.
- Do not let pesticide, sanitizer, nutrient concentrate, rinse water with contamination, or spill liquid go into stormwater.
- Show the Watercare and Auckland triggers for a pollution event in a position where personnel can see them. Give personnel training on the triggers.
- The waste contractors and the disposal records are current. The findings of the drill each year go into the CAPA.
Training for competency
| Module | Personnel | Result that personnel show |
|---|---|---|
| The legal gate for NZ medicinal cannabis | QA, procurement, IPM leads and cultivation leads | Reject a possible product, or give approval for it, with a correct record of the evidence |
| Hygiene zones and movement | All personnel for cultivation, sanitation and maintenance, and contractors | Do the room sequence, the changes of tools and PPE, and the procedure for exceptions |
| Scouting, and how to collect and keep specimens | Scouts and room leads | Use the same scouting route. Identify plant parts. Record incidence and severity. Keep unknown specimens. |
| Mother stock and HLVd | Personnel for the nursery, personnel for the mother plants and QA personnel | Collect a sample that you can trace. Start a batch hold. Trace the clones. Do the steps for a positive result. |
| Control with beneficial organisms | IPM personnel and personnel for receipt | Examine the viability on receipt, the release map, the compatibility and the establishment |
| Application, REI and PPE | Applicators, supervisors, QA and EHS | Calibrate. Mix. Apply. Contain waste. Put warning signs in position. Release the treated area. |
| CAPA and the effect on the batch | QA, cultivation managers and the IPM lead | Do a mock event from containment to the check of the effect |
Do drills for these events as a minimum. A mother has a positive result for HLVd. A cluster of Botrytis occurs in the last stage of flowering. Root disease occurs on a circuit for more than one area.
After application, you find a product that the regulations do not let you use. A worker goes into an area during the REI. A spill can go to a drain. You know that a procedure is satisfactory only after personnel use it in a drill.
Evidence and version register
| Class of claim | Minimum evidence | Trigger for a new check |
|---|---|---|
| NZ regulations | A current source from an authority: the Ministry, MPI, EPA, WorkSafe, Watercare or Auckland | A change of a regulation or guidance, a new product or organism, or the check each year |
| Biology of pests and diseases | A primary paper or a review article of high quality, with the limits for the species | A new result of diagnosis, or an organism with behavior that is different from the behavior in this blueprint |
| Status of the product or organism | Current register and approval, label, SDS, supplier and approval of the site | Each time that you get a product or use it, and each change of the document |
| Facility threshold | Records of the site, the evidence for the risk, and quality approval | A trend that you did not find, crop loss, a false alarm, or a change of production procedure or market |
| Setpoint for operation | A facility SOP or validation that you can identify, and measured data | A change of equipment, cultivar, room, substrate or production procedure |
| A photo that an AI tool made | The last prompt, the AI tool, a check of the diagnosis that a person does, and a record that an AI tool made the photo | An error in the morphology, a problem in training, or a better reference that you know is correct |
In a strong IPM program, the facility has no products that the regulations do not let you use, and no genetics with an infection. Water and air do not become systems that move pests and pathogens. The movement of personnel is easy to see. You can see the release criteria when you select a control. All other parts are not necessary.
References
- New Zealand Ministry of Health. Pesticide use during cultivation of medicinal cannabis. Guidance under the Misuse of Drugs (Medicinal Cannabis) Regulations 2019; updated guidance effective from July 2024. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer) https://www.health.govt.nz/regulation-legislation/medicinal-cannabis/information-for-industry/pesticide-use-during-cultivation
- New Zealand Ministry of Health. Requirements for the medicinal cannabis minimum quality standard. Testing, validation, laboratory and pesticide requirements; page current in 2026. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer) https://www.health.govt.nz/regulation-legislation/medicinal-cannabis/information-for-industry/working-with-medicinal-cannabis/requirements-for-the-minimum-quality-standard
- New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries. ACVMs exempt from registration: exemption classes, conditions and obligations under other legislation. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer) https://www.mpi.govt.nz/agriculture/agricultural-compounds-vet-medicines/acvms-exempt-from-registration
- New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries. Steps to importing invertebrates: eligibility, import health standards, facilities, permits and EPA status determination. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer) https://www.mpi.govt.nz/import/importing-live-animals/invertebrates/steps-to-importing-invertebrates
- New Zealand Environmental Protection Authority. What hazardous-substance approvals are and how to find an approval, including SDS section 15 and current controls. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer) https://www.epa.govt.nz/hazardous-substances/substance-approvals-and-group-standards/what-approvals-are-and-how-to-find-one-for-your-product/
- WorkSafe New Zealand. Restricted entry intervals for pesticides - quick guide: labels/SDS, off-label risk assessment, indoor signs, access and PPE. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer) https://www.worksafe.govt.nz/topic-and-industry/hazardous-substances/regulations/restricted-entry-intervals-for-pesticides/restricted-entry-intervals-for-pesticides-quick-guide/
- WorkSafe New Zealand. Information, instruction, supervision and training for workers handling hazardous substances. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer) https://www.worksafe.govt.nz/topic-and-industry/hazardous-substances/managing/information-instruction-supervision-training/
- Watercare. Trade waste agreements: classification, controls, monitoring and management-plan requirements for Auckland businesses. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer) https://www.watercare.co.nz/business/help-and-support/trade-waste/trade-waste-agreements
- Auckland Council. Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part, E33 Industrial and trade activities: contaminant avoidance, onsite management, containment and lawful disposal. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer) https://unitaryplan.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/Images/Auckland%20Unitary%20Plan%20Operative/Chapter%20E%20Auckland-wide/5.%20Environmental%20Risk/E33%20Industrial%20and%20trade%20activities.pdf
- Athena Ag, Inc. (2026). IPM Guide for Cannabis, V15 digital edition. Commercial vendor guide supplied by the user; used only as a coverage benchmark. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer)
- Ahmed, M. Z., McKenzie, C. L., & Osborne, L. S. (2024). Arthropod and mollusk pests of hemp, Cannabis sativa (Rosales: Cannabaceae), and their indoor management plan in Florida. Journal of Integrated Pest Management, 15(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmad028
- Pulkoski, M. A., & Burrack, H. J. (2023). Assessing the impact of piercing-sucking pests on greenhouse-grown industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Environmental Entomology, 53(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvad044
- Cranshaw, W., Halbert, S. E., Favret, C., Britt, K., & Miller, G. L. (2018). Phorodon cannabis Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae), a newly recognized pest in North America found on industrial hemp. Insecta Mundi, 0662, 1-12. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/1162/
- Cranshaw, W., & Wainwright-Evans, S. (2020). Cannabis sativa as a host of rice root aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in North America. Journal of Integrated Pest Management, 11(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmaa008
- Lopez, L. (2023). Meet Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae): a commonly used predatory mite in vegetable crops. Journal of Integrated Pest Management, 14(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmad018
- van Maanen, R., Vila, E., Sabelis, M. W., & Janssen, A. (2010). Biological control of broad mites (Polyphagotarsonemus latus) with the generalist predator Amblyseius swirskii. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 52(1), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-010-9343-2
- Cloyd, R. A. (2015). Ecology of fungus gnats (Bradysia spp.) in greenhouse production systems associated with disease-interactions and alternative management strategies. Insects, 6(2), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects6020325
- Effects of Selected Biopesticides on Two Arthropod Pests of Cannabis sativa L. in Northeastern Oregon. (2024). Crops, 4(4), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/crops4040019
- Punja, Z. K. (2021). Emerging diseases of Cannabis sativa and sustainable management. Pest Management Science, 77(9), 3857-3870. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6307
- Scott, C., & Punja, Z. K. (2021). Evaluation of disease management approaches for powdery mildew on Cannabis sativa L. (marijuana) plants. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 43(3), 394-412. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2020.1836026
- Mahmoud M, BenRejeb I, Punja ZK, Buirs L, Jabaji S. Understanding bud rot development, caused by Botrytis cinerea, on cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) plants grown under greenhouse conditions. Botany. 2023;101(4):200-231. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2022-0139
- Punja, Z.K., Tirajoh, A., Collyer, D., & Ni, L. (2023). Biological control of Fusarium oxysporum causing damping-off and Pythium myriotylum causing root and crown rot on cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) plants. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 45(3), 245-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2023.2172082
- Sutton, J. C., Sopher, C. R., Owen-Going, T. N., Liu, W., Grodzinski, B., Hall, J. C., & Benchimol, R. L. (2006). Etiology and epidemiology of Pythium root rot in hydroponic crops: current knowledge and perspectives. Summa Phytopathologica, 32(4), 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-54052006000400001
- Atallah OO et al. (2023). Hop latent viroid: a hidden threat to the cannabis industry. Viruses / PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10053334/
- Transmission, spread, longevity and management of hop latent viroid in cannabis in North America (2025). PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11902214/
- Mechanical transmission and management of Hop Latent Viroid (HLVd) in cannabis: spread via contaminated tools and cuttings; under experimental conditions linked cuttings can approach complete infection within weeks; controls include fresh gloves per plant, tool sterilisation and footbaths. Plants (MDPI) 2025, 14:830. https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/14/5/830
- Rahnama M, Szarka D, Li H, Dixon E, Castlebury LA, Gauthier N (2021). Reemergence of Septoria leaf spot caused by Septoria cannabis on hemp in Kentucky, confirmed by sequence data. Plant Disease 105:2286-2289. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-20-2620-SC
- Ujata AH, Konishi S, Kato Y, Tonami H, Nakashima C (2024). Septoria cannabicola, a new species on Cannabis sativa from Japan. Mycoscience 65:92-95. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11369300/
Each citation in the paper, for example [1], refers to an item in this list. Each item is a primary source or an instruction from an authority, unless the item shows a different type. The results of cannabis tissue culture change much with the genotype. Before you use the dilutions, hormone doses and local regulations, make sure that they agree with the primary sources.