TEROS-12 measurements and how to control irrigation with them
A TEROS-12 probe in your substrate gives three numbers: the quantity of water in the substrate, the salt concentration of the water, and the temperature. This guide gives information about each number. It shows that you must change the raw reading before it is the correct value. It also shows how to use the reading to make irrigation decisions that you can be sure of for a crop.
Purpose and scope
A TEROS-12 is a small probe that you push into substrate: coco, rockwool or soil. It sends three numbers through one digital wire: the quantity of water in the substrate, the salt concentration of that water, and the temperature. This guide starts from zero. It gives information about each number and about how the probe gets the number. It also gives the cause of an important instruction: do not use only the raw reading to open a valve.
The probe measures a volume of approximately 1010 mL (34.2 fl oz) of substrate around its prongs. It does not measure all the root zone.[8] The next sections show how to change that one local reading, which can have an error, into a number for irrigation control.
- The TEROS-12 gives volumetric water content (VWC), bulk electrical conductivity (EC) and substrate temperature through the digital protocol SDI-12.
- The volume of influence of the probe is only approximately 1010 mL (34.2 fl oz) of substrate around the prongs. This volume is one local position. It is not the average of a tray or a zone.
- This guide changes that local reading, which has noise, into a good estimate of the quantity of water. The guide always gives the uncertainty of the estimate.
- It is not necessary to know about soil sensors before you read this guide. Each term has a definition where it first occurs.
This guide is for a person who puts a moisture probe in a pot. The person wants to control irrigation with the probe and to include the uncertainty. Use this guide with the guide to smart irrigation (VWC/EC) and the paper on crop steering in coco.
Definitions
Six terms are necessary for all the information in this guide. Each term has an easy definition here. After this section, the guide uses each term with the same definition. The terms occur again in the next sections.
Evidence and limitations
We want each paper to be correct. Thus we examine each paper for information that is not solid. This information comes from the view of one grower, from a small number of sources, or from grower methods that have no controlled test. We identify this information, and we do not show it as solid.
Frequently there is no paper for the decision that you must make. Then we use the reports of other growers and the methods that work in the rooms that we know. This information can help you, but it is not the result of a laboratory test. Use the methods that work for your plants, for your room and for your meters. If a table does not agree with your crop, use the data from your crop and record the difference.
- Capacitance probes calculate the VWC from the permittivity. The calibration for the medium is important.
- The estimate of pore-water EC has limits, as for the Hilhorst model and models of the same type.
- The depth of the installation, the volume of influence, and the usual positions of probes in many pots.
- The accuracy values of the manufacturer as values that you always get with no calibration for your medium.
If you find an error, make a report. We will correct it. Make the report on GitHub, with the name of the paper and the information that is incorrect. If you have a source, include it: Make a report of an accuracy problem. The regulations, labels and licenses of your area always override each procedure in these papers. The label weak in a paper shows the points where the risk of an error is highest.
How the probe measures water and does not touch it
The TEROS-12 is a capacitance probe. Its prongs send a high-frequency electric field into the substrate around them. The probe measures how strongly the substrate holds the field. This property is permittivity.
The permittivity of water (approximately 80) is approximately twenty times the permittivity of dry substrate (approximately 3–5) and approximately eighty times the permittivity of air (approximately 1). Thus a change in water content causes a large change in the bulk permittivity of the substrate. You can calculate the size of this change. As a result, you can use permittivity to find VWC.[1]
Then the probe uses a calibration equation to change the measured permittivity to a VWC number. The equation in the probe is a generic curve for mineral soil. The probe gives the VWC number with a resolution of 0.001 m³/m³. There is a problem from the start: the equation is different for different substrates, and the generic curve has an accuracy of only ±0.03 m³/m³.[8]
- Permittivity is the physical quantity that the probe measures. VWC is a calculated and calibrated estimate. It is one more step after the measurement.
- The curve from permittivity to VWC is not a straight line. It is most different from a straight line near saturation. There the curve becomes flat. A substrate that is almost full can give a ‘full’ reading when it is not full.
- The temperature of the substrate changes the dielectric response. The change is a known physical effect. It can cause a change in the reading that is the same as a change in water content. Correct the reading for this effect.[4]
- The probe sends data through SDI-12. Three values show a fault in the equipment or the cable. The first is a constant value at 0 or at full scale. The second is a ‘NaN’ value (not a number). The third is an expired value (the probe sends the last value again). These values are not readings of data.
Calibrate the probe to the substrate that you use
When you receive the TEROS-12, it has a generic calibration for mineral soil. This calibration has an accuracy of only ±0.03 m³/m³. A substrate-specific calibration for your coco or rockwool decreases the error to ±0.01–0.02 m³/m³.[3] This difference is important when you use the probe. Frequently, the dryback windows in crop steering are smaller than the error band of the generic calibration (±0.03). If you use a VWC without calibration for steering, the changes that you want are in the noise.
An example of safe headroom shows the result of this difference. An estimate that ignores the error gives 256 mL (8.7 fl oz) of ‘room to apply water’. When you include an accuracy of ±0.02, the safe quantity is approximately 109 mL (3.7 fl oz). With the generic calibration (accuracy ±0.03), the safe quantity is only approximately 54 mL (1.8 fl oz). The pot and the probe are the same. The only difference is how you include the error band when you calculate.[7]
| Calibration type | VWC accuracy | Resolution | Accurate steering? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generic calibration for mineral soil (in the probe) | ±0.03 m³/m³ | 0.001 m³/m³ | No. The error band is wider than a usual dryback window. |
| Substrate-specific calibration | ±0.01–0.02 m³/m³ | 0.001 m³/m³ | Yes. It is necessary for accurate steering. |
Make sure that you use a substrate-specific calibration: it is necessary for accurate steering. Calibration corrects only an additive offset in the reading. The gain error and the nonlinearity near saturation stay, and they do not cancel when you calculate with the reading. Include the residual error that stays after the calibration.
The EC reading and its limits
The probe measures bulk EC, the conductivity of all the wet substrate (0–20000 µS/cm). Growers must know pore-water EC: the salt concentration of the solution that touches the roots. To calculate pore-water EC, use the Hilhorst (2000) model with bulk EC, VWC and temperature.[2] The bulk EC is the conductivity of the water and the substrate together. The Hilhorst model then gives an estimate of the conductivity of the water only.
The model gives a good estimate, but its sensitivity to its parameters is approximately ±20%. It does not give correct results when the VWC is less than 0.10 m³/m³. Do not use it in this condition.
A more important limit is representativeness: the probe measures one position of approximately 1010 mL (34.2 fl oz). Channeling, dry areas or bad contact between the probe and the substrate can cause a number that is different from the value of the zone. The probe operates correctly at this time.[3]
- The probe measures bulk EC (0–20000 µS/cm) directly. You calculate an estimate of pore-water EC from bulk EC. The two values are not the same.
- The conversion of Hilhorst (2000) has a sensitivity of approximately ±20%. It does not give correct results when the VWC is less than 0.10 m³/m³.[2]
- A representativeness fault: the 1010 mL (34.2 fl oz) of substrate that the probe measures can have a value that is different from the value of the zone. Channeling, an air gap or a probe that is not fully in the substrate can cause the difference. The probe operates correctly at the same time.
- The sensor cannot measure the volume of runoff from each pot. It cannot measure the effective substrate volume. This volume decreases when the roots fill the pot. It cannot find if the system supplied an irrigation shot that the controller started.
| The probe CAN measure | The probe CANNOT measure | Other method |
|---|---|---|
| VWC (local position) | The correct average of the zone for all the pots | Many probes, a cohort model |
| Bulk EC | Runoff volume for each pot | Runoff trays / drain sensors |
| Substrate temperature | Effective substrate volume (decreases when the roots fill the pot) | Measure DUL again at intervals |
| Calculated pore-water EC | If an emitter operated | Flow meter, or a sudden change of the weight from a load cell |
Steering of irrigation with TEROS-12 readings
The method has two parts. Make the raw VWC reading less important. Do not use it as a correct value. Use it as one witness that has noise, with a confidence score (a number that shows how accurate the reading is).
Make a small water-balance model more important. The model holds the best estimate of the water in the substrate. A reading with a high confidence score can change the estimate only by a small quantity.
Monitor dryback (the quantity by which the VWC decreases between shots) and specific yield (the quantity by which the VWC increases for each mL supplied). Specific yield shows when the pot comes near to its capacity. Set the capacity anchor (the DUL value that the system uses) from the DUL that you measured, and not from a number without a measurement. Control irrigation with trends (the shape and the slope of the dryback) more than with the absolute value, because an additive calibration offset does not change trends.[6] Do not use only a trend. Always use a second witness, for example the time of runoff or the weight of the pot.
- 1Calibrate to your substrate firstA substrate-specific calibration is the first necessary step. If you do not have it, your steering is in the error band. You cannot be sure that the reading is sufficiently accurate.
- 2Make sure that the probe contact and position are correctPut the probe tightly in the substrate, in a representative position that does not change. A loose probe or an air gap gives the reading of the substrate around it. It does not give the reading of your root zone.
- 3Measure the DUL of this pot from irrigation events with a second witnessSet the capacity anchor from approximately five irrigation events with runoff or weight data. Do not use only one irrigation event. Give the capacity anchor as a volume of water, and not as a raw VWC number.
- 4Steering with the slope of the dryback, with a limit from the safe headroomUse the slope of the dryback and the specific yield. Use a limit from a headroom estimate that includes the calibration error, and not from the raw estimate.
- 5Use a second witness before you apply waterA second witness (the start of runoff or the mass from a load cell) must give the same result before a signal goes to a valve. The probe reading must not operate a valve if there is no second witness.
Find the cause of a bad reading before you think that the sensor is defective
Most problems with the TEROS-12 do not occur because the sensor is defective. The problem is that a person thinks that the reading is correct when it is not. First, find the difference between two conditions. An incorrect reading is a representativeness fault. The probe operates correctly, but the 1010 mL (34.2 fl oz) that it measures has a different value from the zone. With an incorrect reading, decrease your confidence in the absolute VWC number.
A constant, NaN or expired value is a fault in the equipment or the cable. With this value, stop all automatic operation.
Monitor for a VWC that changes with the temperature cycle of the substrate each day. This change is not a change in the quantity of water. It is an artifact: the probe does not touch the substrate correctly, or the calibration is incorrect.[5] Monitor the wetting curve and the drying curve of each pot. If they are different from the usual curves, the cause is possibly hydrophobic substrate or channeling.
Monitor each pot that is different from the pots near it that have the same treatment. The cause is possibly a blocked emitter or a defective probe. It is not a problem of the plant.
Do not let temperature and EC change the estimate of stored water directly. Let them change your confidence in the reading. The temperature cycle of each day can cause a dielectric change in dry substrate. This change is a physical effect. It has the same effect on the reading as a change in water content.[4]
Do not let that change write the VWC. If you do, a physical effect causes the irrigation, and not the water uptake of the plant.
| Symptom | Possible cause | It is NOT | Task |
|---|---|---|---|
| The VWC is at the limit of the range, is constant, is ‘NaN’ or is an expired value | Fault in the equipment or the cable | A correct reading of water | Stop steering. Operate a safe procedure with limits. Tell a person. |
| The VWC changes with the temperature each day | Bad contact, or an artifact of the calibration | A change in the quantity of water | Decrease the confidence in the absolute VWC. Examine the position of the probe.[5] |
| The wetting curve and the drying curve are very different | Channeling, or hydrophobic substrate | Defective sensor | Examine the substrate. Make the substrate wet again. Examine the position of the probe. |
| One pot is different from the pots near it | Blocked emitter or defective probe | A problem of the plant, at this time | Examine the emitter and the probe before you think that the plant has a problem. |
Do not let one manual reading or one observation by a person set a capacity anchor. Do not let it override a safety interlock. A capacity anchor must come from more than one irrigation event, with a second witness for each irrigation event. One good observation is not sufficient.
Expected results and limitations
One TEROS-12 cannot give you the correct condition of the root zone for each zone. If you think that it can, you make the most frequent error and the error with the highest cost. With a substrate-specific calibration, you can find the trends of dryback. You can also calculate an estimate of the water in the substrate with an accuracy of approximately ±0.01–0.02 m³/m³ in the position of the probe. This accuracy is sufficient for steering if you include the uncertainty in your decisions and compare the data with a second witness.[3]
- With a substrate-specific calibration, the best result is a correct shape of the dryback. The accuracy for the stored water in the local position of the probe is approximately ±0.01–0.02 m³/m³.
- One probe cannot give the runoff for each zone. It cannot show that the system supplied water. It cannot give the correct average of the zone for all the pots.
- A load cell (pot weight) is the most important sensor to add, because it measures the water in the substrate directly. It does not use the dielectric properties of the substrate.
- Make the system give a clear ‘I cannot tell’ output. Do not give a precision that is higher than the accuracy. Let the system control only when the data show that it can.
The best method is to make the system show when it cannot tell. The system must not give a number with more confidence than the data give. Calibrate first and add a second witness. Then read the guide to smart irrigation (VWC/EC) for information on how those signals control the shots. Read the paper on signal and noise for information on the difference between a trend and sensor noise.
References
- Topp, G. C., Davis, J. L., & Annan, A. P. (1980). Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resources Research, 16(3), 574-582. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i003p00574
- Hilhorst, M. A. (2000). A Pore Water Conductivity Sensor. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64(6), 1922-1925. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.6461922x
- Fragkos, A., Loukatos, D., Kargas, G., & Arvanitis, K. G. (2024). Response of the TEROS 12 Soil Moisture Sensor under Different Soils and Variable Electrical Conductivity. Sensors, 24(7), 2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24072206
- Nasta, P., Coccia, F., Lazzaro, U., Bogena, H. R., Huisman, J. A., Sica, B., Mazzitelli, C., Vereecken, H., & Romano, N. (2024). Temperature-Corrected Calibration of GS3 and TEROS-12 Soil Water Content Sensors. Sensors, 24(3), 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24030952
- Kapilaratne, R. G. C. J. & Lu, M. (2012). Correcting the Temperature Influence on Soil Capacitance Sensors Using Diurnal Temperature and Water Content Cycles. Sensors, 12(7), 9773-9790. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120709773
- Tavan, M., Wee, B., Brodie, G., Fuentes, S., Pang, A., & Gupta, D. (2021). Optimizing Sensor-Based Irrigation Management in a Soilless Vertical Farm for Growing Microgreens. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 622720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.622720
- Nemali, K. S. & van Iersel, M. W. (2006). An automated system for controlling drought stress and irrigation in potted plants. Scientia Horticulturae, 110(3), 292-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.07.009
- METER Group, Inc. (2023). TEROS 11/12 User Manual & Specifications. METER Group, Pullman, WA. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer) https://metergroup.com/products/teros-12/
Each citation in the paper, for example [1], refers to an item in this list. Each item is a primary source or an instruction from an authority, unless the item shows a different type. The results of cannabis tissue culture change much with the genotype. Before you use the dilutions, hormone doses and local regulations, make sure that they agree with the primary sources.